Move draw_if_interactive logic to new_figure_manager_given_figure.#15
Move draw_if_interactive logic to new_figure_manager_given_figure.#15fperez merged 1 commit intoipython:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Other than the minor comments above, this looks clean enough, and I trust your judgment far more than mine on where the API is going. Thanks!! Once we finalize/merge this, I'd like to cut a release to get the fix for mpl #23007 out so that can be closed. |
|
Did you forget to put in the comments? |
|
No, I mean the inline comments in the file review about the missing docstrings, that's all :) |
Currently, Matplotlib only ever calls draw_if_interactive at the end of
`plt.figure()` (and upon figure unpickling), i.e. this is a mechanism to
further customize handling of newly generated figures. (Prior to
Matplotlib 1.5, draw_if_interactive was also called at the end of all
pyplot functions to trigger a figure redraw, but this is now handled by
the stale attribute.)
In order to simplify the backend API ("what is the API that a backend
module must/can provide"), I am planning to deprecate (on Matplotlib's
side) the ability for backends to provide a draw_if_interactive function
(forcing them to always do `if interactive(): draw_idle()`). Instead,
any relevant new-figure-customization logic can instead go into
`new_figure_manager_given_figure`. This PR implements this change for
matplotlib-inline, and should be fully back-compatible all the way back
to Matplotlib 1.5. I would like to make these changes first on the side
of the clients (i.e., the third-party backends), to catch any possible
problems with the intended change on Matplotlib's side.
|
I still don't see the comments, but I assume you meant that new_figure_manager{,_given_figure} needed docstrings; I have now added them. |
|
Yup, that was it @anntzer, thx! BTW, that's weird - this is what I meant by my comments, I see them right in this page above:
Do you not see the above? Odd. |
|
I'll give this a day or two in case anyone else can comments, and if not we should merge it (if by chance I forget, @anntzer please don't be shy to ping me - thx for the contribution!!) |
|
The docstrings have been added now (your previous comments did not show up for me because they are still marked as pending on your side). |
|
Ah, thanks for that note, @anntzer! I didn't realize that the "pending" label on my comments meant they hadn't been pushed for view of others. But yes, I'd seen your docstring updates, thx for those. I think this extra time is enough for a minor change like this, merging now (once tests complete, just realized I had to approve the workflow to run). |
| # should be a no-op (otherwise we'll generate duplicate plots, since a user | ||
| # who set ioff() manually expects to make separate draw/show calls). | ||
| if not matplotlib.is_interactive(): | ||
| return |
2 participants
Currently, Matplotlib only ever calls draw_if_interactive at the end of
plt.figure()(and upon figure unpickling), i.e. this is a mechanism tofurther customize handling of newly generated figures. (Prior to
Matplotlib 1.5, draw_if_interactive was also called at the end of all
pyplot functions to trigger a figure redraw, but this is now handled by
the stale attribute.)
In order to simplify the backend API ("what is the API that a backend
module must/can provide"), I am planning to deprecate (on Matplotlib's
side) the ability for backends to provide a draw_if_interactive function
(forcing them to always do
if interactive(): draw_idle()) (matplotlib/matplotlib#23105). Instead,any relevant new-figure-customization logic can instead go into
new_figure_manager_given_figure. This PR implements this change formatplotlib-inline, and should be fully back-compatible all the way back
to Matplotlib 1.5. I would like to make these changes first on the side
of the clients (i.e., the third-party backends), to catch any possible
problems with the intended change on Matplotlib's side.